Dunqing 47e69a8c94 fix(transformer-optional-catch-binding): the unused binding is not in the correct scope (#5066) ... Blocked by #5008 In the SemanticBuilder, we insert all CatchClause parameters in the BlockStatement scope, a child-scope of CatchClause 858f510d59/crates/oxc_semantic/src/builder.rs (L709-L718) So we should do the same thing in this plugin, but because CatchClause has no parameters, SemanticBuilder doesn't create scope for `CatchClause`. This cause we cannot find the `BlockStatement` scope_id. This PR has changed to the correct logic. Just to wait #5008 solved		2024-08-23 13:02:53 +00:00
..
ast_tools	refactor(ast_tools): remove support for #[scope(if(...))] attr (#5113)	2024-08-23 09:28:17 +00:00
benchmark	chore(website): remove textlint annotation	2024-08-23 15:50:52 +08:00
common	feat(coverage): check symbols and scopes after transformation (#4917)	2024-08-16 07:05:11 +00:00
coverage	refactor(semantic)!: always create a scope for for statements (#5110)	2024-08-23 09:28:13 +00:00
javascript_globals	chore: turn off doctest for all [[bin]]	2024-07-14 16:55:19 +08:00
lint_rules	feat(docs): add tracking for plugins "promise" and "vitest" (#4668)	2024-08-05 19:01:44 -04:00
minsize	feat(codegen)!: remove const generic MINIFY (#5001)	2024-08-20 08:13:27 +00:00
prettier_conformance	refactor(parser)!: remove builder pattern from Parser struct (#5000)	2024-08-20 07:40:25 +00:00
rulegen	feat(rulegen): improve examples in documentation (#4815)	2024-08-10 18:48:59 -04:00
transform_conformance	fix(transformer-optional-catch-binding): the unused binding is not in the correct scope (#5066)	2024-08-23 13:02:53 +00:00
website	chore(website): remove textlint annotation	2024-08-23 15:50:52 +08:00