mirror of
https://github.com/danbulant/oxc
synced 2026-05-24 20:32:10 +00:00
Parser incorrectly identifies string literals as directives if they
follow after `import`s, `export`s, or decorators.
In all of these cases, `'use strict'` produces a directive in the AST,
where it should be parsed as an `ExpressionStatement` containing a
`StringLiteral`:
```js
import x from 'foo';
'use strict';
```
```js
export {x};
'use strict';
```
```js
@foo
'use strict';
```
[Playground](https://oxc-project.github.io/oxc/playground/?code=3YCAAIC0gICAgICAgIC0G8rnONK89ITJ3zrK%2FUP7OmSZPgHQzStr3yMtwFTU%2BD1WPt09JgqZJLoYooydbGsM5vGcf34BnIA%3D)
This PR should fix that.
I'm not sure about the decorator case, though. I assume it's not a
directive. But is prefixing a string literal with a decorator even legal
syntax anyway?
And a side nit: If I'm reading it right, I don't think the `continue`
statement in the decorator arm of the match does anything. Do I have
that right?
Last question: Where does one go about putting a test? I guess these
silly cases aren't covered by Babel etc's tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Boshen <boshenc@gmail.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| examples | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||