We have a strange workaround for `visit_function` where we pass in `ScopeFlags`, to support creating the scope inside `Function`, but setting different flags for `MethodDefinition`s.
Previously `visit_function` took `Option<ScopeFlags>` and then did `flags.unwrap_or(ScopeFlags::empty()) | ScopeFlags::Function` to it. Personally, I found this confusing. When I was looking at `MethodDefinition`, I was wondering "It's a function, why doesn't it set Function flag too?"
This changes makes it more explicit and clear what `ScopeFlags` everything has.
* move `visit` and `visit_mut` modules to a super module called `visit`
* add `walk_mut` module containing walk functions
* update `enter_node` and `leave_node` events to not pass a reference in the `VisitMut` trait
* add `AstType`, a non-referencing version of `AstKind` to use with `VisitMut` trait
* update the `VisitMut` trait's usages.
