~~The generated code is only here for the sake of my own comparison (instead of manually keeping a backup of the old generated file). I would clean this up as soon as it is ready, submit some parts of it as the down stack, and stack the actual generated code on top of this. So please don't let the huge diff distract you, It won't have many conflicts since almost all of these are the generated visit code, which is completely contained to its own module(other than some minor renaming refactors).~~
The order of function definitions is a bit different, I've used a depth-first search, We can switch to a breadth-first one to align functions more closely to the original.
We use prettyplease for formatting our generated code, Which has a lot of advantages over rustfmt, But sometimes it conflicts with our cargo fmt config,
Since it isn't configurable I just added a `cargo fmt` step after the generation process to prevent conflicts.
We might be able to not rely on prettyplease at all, But We have to test that one after we have most of our generated code, rustfmt usually bails on nested calls and macros so it might not work as our only solution. In contrast to that prettyplease is used in both bindgen and cargo-expand and is created for this exact reason(formatting generated code).
