close: #3620
In `Babel`, the expected output is:
```ts
var x = 10;
var Foo = function(Foo) {
Foo[Foo['a'] = 10] = 'a';
Foo[Foo['b'] = 10] = 'b';
Foo[Foo['c'] = 30] = 'c';
return Foo;
}(Foo || {});
```
IMO, `Foo.b + x` is enough, because `x` is not a const variable. The
output same as with `typescript`
The remaining test cases will perform better with a scope
implementation, and while we can implement them without the scope, it
still requires us to do what the scope did.
---------
Co-authored-by: Boshen <boshenc@gmail.com>
Related to:
https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/pull/2822#issuecomment-2021802212
Although `babel` has a lot of test cases, we still need to add edge
cases that `babel` doesn't have.
This PR will allow us to add out test cases to
`/root/oxc/tasks/transform_conformance/tests`. The directory structure
is consistent with `babel`
For example
```shell
# cd /root/oxc/tasks/transform_conformance/tests
- babel-transform-plugin–optional-catch-binding
- test
- fixtures
- your tests # add test cases here
```
