Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonathan Johnson
6726855ed0
Cleaning up figures usage in examples 2024-07-26 10:34:30 -07:00
Jonathan Johnson
e70e92726c
Source<T> + Destination<T> (breaking)
Refs #98

This refactor overhauls the reactive system to move all the reactive
methods to traits. The side effect of this change is that now
DynamicReader's API is the same as Dynamic's API, but because it only
implements Source<T>, DynamicReader does not offer any mutation
functions.

While it's unfortunate to have more traits to include to use Cushy, this
seems like the best option, and it offers a path to try to integrate
this into the tuple ForEach/MapEach traits. Unfortunately, my attempt at
doing those in this set of changes led to issues specifying generic
associated lifetimes for the DynamicGuard. But, I was also in the middle
of this larger refactoring, so it might be that a fresh attempt will
succeed.
2024-01-02 09:00:29 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
2fe28729df
Directly depending on figures
While this was a workaround for a docs.rs issue (Px/Lp are not
linked), I decided having the shorter import path would look better in
the examples.

It probably wasn't necessary to update all of the references in the
internal code, but I decided it was worth the consistency.
2023-12-28 09:35:24 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
df479e983e
Renaming crate to Cushy
Refs #117
2023-12-27 19:02:59 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
ce6935a7a7
Making it easier to draw focus correctly 2023-11-29 15:08:12 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
3e651c2964
CursorIcon + disabled refactoring
Input can now accept focus while disabled, and all controls should do
the right thing with regard to cursor icons now.
2023-11-22 12:06:29 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
dd38fa7bf4
More fluent APIs 2023-11-22 05:54:35 -08:00
Jonathan Johnson
2201f2c83b
Ranged sliders, advance_focus, allow_blur
Closes #60

Stepping in sliders is a compromise due to the flexibility of the
current slider implementation. I don't want to force types to implement
Add, and I don't like forcing types to require a Step (ie, what's the
appropriate value for f32 to specify as its next value?). Using a
percentage combined with lerp keeps the implementation fairly
straightfoward, although I remember experiencing this type of
configuration in another UI framework a long time ago and thinking it
was a little annoying to work with.

Ultimately, setting actual step boundaries can be done by customizing
the type that the slider is operating over. I feel like that's a much
more powerful design than I've experienced in previous frameworks, so
I'm hoping this percent step behavior is a reasonable compromise.
2023-11-20 19:44:03 -08:00